![SBU](/static/images/logo.png)
Hypnosbehandling vid smärta, ångestsyndrom eller depression
Fråga och sammanfattning
Hypnos är en behandling med ett specifikt mål som syftar till att exempelvis lindra smärta eller minska symtom vid ångestsyndrom eller depression. Behandlingen utförs av legitimerad hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal.
Fråga
Vilken sammanställd forskning finns om effekter av hypnos som behandling vid smärta, ångestsyndrom eller depression?
Frågeställare: Specialistläkare, Barn och Ungdomspsykiatri, Umeå
Sammanfattning
SBU:s upplysningstjänst har efter litteratursökning och bedömning av risk för bias i systematiska översikter inte redovisat någon systematisk översikt i svaret. Tre relevanta systematiska översikter har identifierats som undersökt effekten av hypnos som behandling på smärta vid brännskador, fibromyalgi samt vid fantomsmärta. Upplysningstjänsten har dock bedömt att risken för bias i dessa översikter är hög. Författarnas slutsatser redovisas därför inte i svaret.
Bakgrund
Hypnos kan ges med olika syften. I medicinska sammanhang kan det ges som ett icke-farmakologiskt alternativ eller som tillägg till konventionell behandling mot smärta, ångestsyndrom eller depression. Behandlingen har studerats vid smärttillstånd såsom muskuloskeletal eller neuropatisk smärta (en benämning på smärta som härrör från rörelseorgan som muskler, leder, skelettdelar eller tillhörande mjukdelar respektive smärta från nervsystemet) [1]. Hypnos har även studerats som behandling mot smärtor i samband med brännskador, förlossningssmärtor, operationer eller sjukdomar som cancer och IBS (Irratable Bowel Syndrome) som bland annat yttrar sig i form av smärta, svullnad och uppblåsthet i magen [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].
Hypnos är en kropp-själ och avslappningsteknik (engelska: mind-body therapy) vilket innebär att den är baserad på samverkan mellan kropp och psyke, med avsikten att bland annat åstadkomma avslappning och känslomässigt välbefinnande [7]. Behandlingen bygger dels på att utövaren bedömer problemet och utifrån detta styr behandlingen, dels på att patienten är mottaglig för hypnotisk induktion, vilket sätter personen i ett transliknande tillstånd. Patienten bör fokusera på något för att slappna av så att behandlarens förslag till ändringar i patientens subjektiva upplevelser kan bli verkliga. Detta sker i samförstånd mellan vårdgivare och patient [8] [9].
Enligt patientsäkerhetslagen (2010:659) får endast hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal yrkesmässigt ge hypnosbehandling [10]. Lindriga biverkningar kan förekomma vilket kan innebära dåsighet, yrsel, stelhet och huvudvärk [7].
Frågeställning och avgränsningar
Upplysningstjänsten har tillsammans med frågeställaren formulerat frågan enligt följande PICO1:
Population | Vuxna patienter (≥18 år) som har smärta, ångestsyndrom eller depression |
Intervention | Hypnos i ett behandlande syfte utförd av hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal |
Control | Annan eller ingen behandling |
Outcome | Symtomlindring, tillfrisknande och/eller minskad användning av läkemedel mot smärta, ångestsyndrom eller depression. Negativa effekter såsom biverkningar. |
1. PICO är en förkortning för patient/population/problem, intervention (insats, behandling)/, comparison/control (jämförelseintervention (insats, behandling)) och outcome (utfallsmått).
Upplysningstjänsten har gjort sökningar (Bilaga 1) i databaserna Medline (Ovid), Scopus, PsycInfo samt i INAHTA2:s databas för HTA3-rapporter. Vi har även handsökt publikationer på webbsidor för regionala HTA-organisationer och myndigheter.
2. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA)
3. Utvärdering av hälso- och sjukvårdens (och i SBU:s fall socialtjänstens) metoder (engelska: Health Technology Assessment)
Svaret har begränsats till systematiska översikter.
Upplysningstjänsten inkluderar artiklar publicerade i vetenskapliga tidskrifter samt systematiska översikter och rapporter från myndigheter och HTA-organisationer, som är publicerade på engelska eller ett av de skandinaviska språken.
Bedömning av risk för bias
I en systematisk översikt finns det risk för bias, det vill säga att resultatet blir snedvridet på grund av brister i avgränsning, litteratursökning och hantering av resultatet. Det är därför viktigt att granska metoden i en systematisk översikt. Två utredare bedömde risken för bias i översikterna med stöd av SBU:s granskningsmall för att översiktligt bedöma risken för snedvridning/systematiska fel hos systematiska översikter (Bilaga 4). Granskningsmallen har sex steg och bygger på frågorna i AMSTAR granskningsmall [11]. Om översikten inte uppfyllde kraven listade i de fyra första stegen bedömdes den ha hög risk för bias och granskades inte vidare. En systematisk översikt bedöms ha måttlig risk för bias om den uppfyller alla kraven till och med steg 4, och låg om den uppfyller samtliga steg i SBU:s mall (Bilaga 5 och Faktaruta 2).
Systematiska översikter med måttlig eller låg risk för bias beskrivs i text och tabell. De översikter som bedöms ha hög risk för bias presenteras inte i text och tabell eftersom risken för att resultaten är missvisande bedöms vara för hög.
Resultat från sökningen och bedömning av risk för bias
Upplysningstjänstens litteratursökning genererade totalt 619 artiklar efter dubblettkontroll. Ett flödesschema för urvalsprocessen visas i Bilaga 2. Två utredare på SBU läste alla artikelsammanfattningar och bedömde att 108 översikter kunde vara relevanta för frågan. Dessa artiklar lästes i fulltext av två utredare och de artiklar som inte var relevanta för frågan exkluderades. Exkluderade artiklar finns listade i Bilaga 3.
Tre systematiska översikter bedömdes vara relevanta. Två utredare på Upplysningstjänsten bedömde risken för bias i dessa och fann att den var hög i alla tre [2] [12] [13]. Upplysningstjänstens bedömning av risk för bias redovisas i Bilaga 4.
Systematiska översikter
SBU:s upplysningstjänst inkluderade tre systematiska översikter med hög risk för bias [2] [12] [13]. Resultat och slutsatser presenteras inte i text och tabell eftersom risken för att resultaten är missvisande bedöms vara för hög.
Lästips
En systematisk översikt av Schaefert och medförfattare från år 2014 kan vara av intresse. Den uppfyllde inte inklusionskriterierna eftersom det ingick ”själv-hypnos” i en del av studierna där behandlingen delvis skett i hemmet med hjälp av ljudfiler och instruktioner. Översiktsförfattarna har rapporterat sammanvägda resultat från randomiserade kontrollerade studier (RCT-studier) som studerat effekten av hypnosbehandling på livskvalitet och typiska IBS-symtom, som diarré, förstoppning och smärta hos vuxna [5]. Hypnosbehandlingarna i de ingående studierna gavs främst individuellt men även i grupp av utbildad hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal.
Vetenskapliga kunskapsluckor
Enligt SBU:s modell innebär en vetenskaplig kunskapslucka att det saknas evidens för vilken sammanvägd effekt en metod eller insats har, det vill säga kunskap från en systematisk översikt (Faktaruta 3).
SBU:s upplysningstjänst har efter litteratursökning identifierat tre systematiska översikter med hög risk för bias. Ingen litteratursökning efter primärstudier har gjorts. För att besvara Upplysningstjänstens fråga behövs en välgjord systematisk översikt som identifierar alla relevanta primärstudier och väger samman resultaten.
Projektgrupp
Detta svar är sammanställt av Shahrzad Kia Komujuni (utredare), Stina Cornell Kärnekull (utredare), Sally Saad (utredare), Sara Fundell (projektadministratör), Irene Edebert (produktsamordnare), Per Lytsy (intern sakkunnig) samt Pernilla Östlund (avdelningschef) vid SBU.
Svaret har granskats av Steven Linton, professor emeritus, Institutionen för beteende-, social- och rättsvetenskap, Örebro universitet.
Referenser
- Langlois P, Perrochon A, David R, Rainville P, Wood C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Hypnosis to manage musculoskeletal and neuropathic chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;135:104591. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104591.
- Scheffler M, Koranyi S, Meissner W, Strauss B, Rosendahl J. Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for procedural pain relief in adults undergoing burn wound care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2018;44(7):1709-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.019.
- Madden K, Middleton P, Cyna AM, Matthewson M, Jones L. Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(5):CD009356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
- Sandvik RK, Olsen BF, Rygh LJ, Moi AL. Pain relief from nonpharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(9-10):1488-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15194.
- Schaefert R, Klose P, Moser G, Hauser W. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of hypnosis in adult irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2014;76(5):389-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000039.
- Tefikow S, Barth J, Maichrowitz S, Beelmann A, Strauss B, Rosendahl J. Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(5):623-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.005.
- Gamus D, Kedar A, Kleinhauz M. Hypnosis in palliative care. Prog Palliat Care. 2013;20(5):278-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1179/1743291x12y.0000000025.
- Green JP, Barabasz AF, Barrett D, Montgomery GH. Forging ahead: the 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2005;53(3):259-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140590961321.
- Elkins GR, Barabasz AF, Council JR, Spiegel D. Advancing Research and Practice: The Revised APA Division 30 Definition of Hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypn. 2015;57(4):378-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465.
- SFS 2010:659. Patientsäkerhetslagen Svensk författningssamling. Stockholm: Riksdagen. [accessed Nov 23 2023]. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/patientsakerhetslag-2010659_sfs-2010-659/#top.
- Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009.
- Batsford S, Ryan CG, Martin DJ. Non-pharmacological conservative therapy for phantom limb pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(3):173-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1288283.
- Zech N, Hansen E, Bernardy K, Hauser W. Efficacy, acceptability and safety of guided imagery/hypnosis in fibromyalgia - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(2):217-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.933.
Bilaga 1 Dokumentation av sökstrategier
Medline via OvidSP 6 Sep. 2023
Search terms | Items found | |
---|---|---|
/ = Term from the MeSH controlled vocabulary;.sh = Term from the MeSH controlled vocabulary; exp= Term from MeSH including terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy; .ti,ab = Title or abstract; .tw = Title or abstract; .kf = Keywords; .kw = Keywords, exact; .bt = Book title. NLM Bookshelf.; .pt = Publication type; .ja = Journal abbreviation; .af = All fields; adjn = Adjacent. Proximity operator retrieving adjacent words, adj3 retrieves records with search terms within two terms from each other.; * or $ = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase * Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for identifying randomized trials in MEDLINE: sensitivity- and precision-maximizing version (2008 revision); Ovid format. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04-technical-supplement-searching-and-selecting-studies#section-3-6-1. with modifications: the following terms are added: clinical trial, phase iii.pt. ; randomised.ab. ; ("Phase 3" or "phase3" or "phase III" or P3 or "PIII").ti,ab,kw. |
||
Population: | ||
1. | Exp Pain/ | 461 882 |
2. | Exp Anxiety/ or Exp Anxiety disorders/ | 188 996 |
3. | Exp Depression/ | 151 812 |
4. | Exp Mood Disorders/ | 170 359 |
5. | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/ | 41 521 |
6. | pain.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 779 328 |
7. | anxiety.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 266 651 |
8. | “General* Anxiety Disorder”.ab,bt,kf,ti | 11 166 |
9. | (Depression or depressive* or depressed or dysthymi* or mood disorder or anxiety*).ab,bt,kf,ti. | 676 357 |
10. | PTSD or ((posttraum* or post traum*) adj3 (disorder* or stress* or symptom* or syndrom*)).ab,bt,kf,ti. | 52 797 |
11. | OR/1-10 | 1 715 531 |
Intervention: | ||
12. | Hypnosis/ | 9505 |
13. | Hypnos*.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 8989 |
14. | Hypnot*.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 19 277 |
15. | Hypnotherap*.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 1401 |
16. | Mesmer*.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 351 |
17. | trance.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 742 |
18. | hypnoanalys*.ab,bt,kf,ti. | 57 |
19. | OR/12-18 | 27 805 |
Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis* | ||
20. | ((Systematic Review/ or Meta-Analysis/ or Cochrane Database Syst Rev.ja. or ((systematic adj4 review) or "meta analys*" or metaanalys*).ti,bt,ab.) not (editorial/ or letter/ or case reports/)) | 446 014 |
Combined sets: | ||
21. | 11 AND 19 AND 20 | 298 |
Final result | ||
22. | 298 |
Scopus via scopus.com 6 Sep. 2023
TITLE-ABS-KEY = Title, abstract or keywords (including indexed keywords and author keywords); ALL = All fields; W/n = Within. Proximity operator retrieving terms within n words from each other.; PRE/n = Precedes by. Proximity operator, the first term in the search must precede the second by n words.; LIMIT-TO (X) = Includes only results of specified type, e.g., publication type or time range.; DOCTYPE = Publication type; “re” = review; “le” = letter; “ed” = editorial; “ch” = book chapter; “cp” = conference proceedings; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
Search terms | Items found | |
---|---|---|
Population: | ||
1. | TITLE-ABS-KEY (Pain OR Anxiety* OR Anxiety Disorder* OR General Anxiety Disorder* OR GAD OR Mood Disorder* OR Depression OR Depressive* OR Depressed OR Dysthymi*) | 260 917 |
2. | TITLE-ABS-KEY (ptsd OR (((posttraum*) W/3 (disorder*; OR stress* OR symptom* OR syndrom*)))) | 88 403 |
3. | OR/1-2 | 322 099 |
Intervention: | ||
4. | TITLE-ABS-KEY (Hypnos* OR Hypnot* OR Mesmer* OR Hypnotherap* OR Trance OR Hypnoanalys*) | 73 863 |
Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
5. | TITLE-ABS-KEY ( ( systematic W/2 review ) OR "meta analy*" OR metaanaly* ) AND (EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE, “le”) OR EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE, “ed”) OR EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE, “ch”) OR EXCLUDE (DOCTYPE, “cp”)) | 653 880 |
Combined sets: | ||
6. | 3 AND 4 AND 5 | 326 |
Final result | ||
7.; | 326 |
PSYCINFO via EBSCO 6 Sep. 2023
TI = Title; AB = Abstract; SU = Keyword, exact or part (including all other fields for indexed and author keywords); DE = Exact keyword; TX = All text; MR = Methodology; Nn = Near. Proximity operator retrieving terms within n words from each other.; * = Truncation; “ “ = Citation Marks; searches for an exact phrase | ||
Search terms | Items found | |
---|---|---|
Population: | ||
1. | DE ("Pain" OR "Acute Pain" OR "Aphagia" OR "Back Pain" OR "Chronic Pain" OR "Headache" OR "Myofascial Pain" OR "Neuralgia" OR "Neuropathic Pain" OR "Somatoform Pain Disorder") | 69 547 |
2. | DE ("Anxiety" OR "Anxiety Disorders" OR “Generalized Anxiety Disorder” OR “Panic Attack” OR Panic Disorder” OR “Phobias”) | 126 436 |
3. | DE ("Depression (Emotion)") OR ("Major Depression") | 177 244 |
4. | DE ("Posttraumatic Stress Disorder" OR "Complex PTSD") | 40 545 |
5. | TI (pain OR anxiety* OR anxiety disorder* OR General Anxiety Disorder* OR GAD Mood Disorder* OR depress* OR dysthymi* OR “posttraumatic stress disorder” or ptsd or ”post traumatic stress disorder” or ”post-traumatic stress disorder”) | 249 087 |
6. | AB (pain OR anxiety* OR anxiety disorder* OR General Anxiety Disorder* OR GAD Mood Disorder* OR depress* OR dysthymi* OR “posttraumatic stress disorder” or ptsd or ”post traumatic stress disorder” or ”post-traumatic stress disorder”) | 582 464 |
7. | SU (pain OR anxiety* OR anxiety disorder* OR General Anxiety Disorder* OR GAD Mood Disorder* OR depress* OR dysthymi* OR “posttraumatic stress disorder” or ptsd or ”post traumatic stress disorder” or ”post-traumatic stress disorder”) | 451 554 |
8. | OR/1-7 | 656 980 |
Intervention: | ||
9. | DE ("Hypnosis") | 9 902 |
10. | TI (hypnos* OR hypnotherapy OR hypnotism or hypnotherapies OR hypoanalys* mesmerism OR trance) | 7076 |
11. | AB (hypnos* OR hypnotherapy OR hypnotism or hypnotherapies OR hypoanalys* mesmerism OR trance) | 12 738 |
12. | SU (hypnos* OR hypnotherapy OR hypnotism or hypnotherapies OR hypoanalys* mesmerism OR trance) | 16 295 |
13. | OR/9-12 | 19 309 |
Study types: systematic reviews and meta-analysis | ||
14. | TI((systematic n3 review) OR "meta analys*" OR metaanalys*) OR AB((systematic n3 review) OR "meta analys*" OR metaanalys*) OR SU((systematic n3 review) OR "meta analys*" OR metaanalys*) OR (MR "Systematic Review" OR MR "meta analysis") | 93 628 |
Combined sets: | ||
15. | 8 AND 13 AND 14 | 96 |
Final result | ||
16. | 96 |
Bilaga 2 Flödesschema för urval av artiklar
Bilaga 3 Exkluderade artiklar
Excluded articles | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Systematic reviews | |
Abdul Khaiyom JH, Mukhtar F, Tian Po O. Treatments for Anxiety Disorders in Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci. 2019;26(3):24-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.3.2. | Wrong intervention |
Adachi T, Fujino H, Nakae A, Mashimo T, Sasaki J. A meta-analysis of hypnosis for chronic pain problems: a comparison between hypnosis, standard care, and other psychological interventions. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2014;62(1):1-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2013.841471. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Al-Moraissi EA, Conti PCR, Alyahya A, Alkebsi K, Elsharkawy A, Christidis N. The hierarchy of different treatments for myogenous temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;26(4):519-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-01009-y. | Wrong intervention |
Amatya B, Young J, Khan F. Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12(12):CD012622. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012622.pub2. | Wrong intervention |
Amsallem F, Sanchez S, Armoiry X, Mion F. Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:4404185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4404185. | Wrong population |
Bardia A, Barton DL, Prokop LJ, Bauer BA, Moynihan TJ. Efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine therapies in relieving cancer pain: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(34):5457-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.3725. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Behzadmehr R, Dastyar N, Moghadam MP, Abavisani M, Moradi M. Effect of complementary and alternative medicine interventions on cancer related pain among breast cancer patients: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2020;49:102318. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102318. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Bernardy K, Füber N, Klose P, Häuser W. Efficacy of hypnosis/guided imagery in fibromyalgia syndrome - a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):133. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-133. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(3):CD003388. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Bissonnette J, Dumont E, Pinard AM, Landry M, Rainville P, Ogez D. Hypnosis and music interventions for anxiety, pain, sleep and well-being in palliative care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003551. | No separate reporting of relevant combination of study design and outcome |
Black CJ, Thakur ER, Houghton LA, Quigley EMM, Moayyedi P, Ford AC. Efficacy of psychological therapies for irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gut. 2020;69(8):1441-51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321191. | No separate reporting of relevant outcome |
Bowker E, Dorstyn D. Hypnotherapy for disability-related pain: A meta-analysis. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(4):526-39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314530452. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Burghardt S, Koranyi S, Magnucki G, Strauss B, Rosendahl J. Non-pharmacological interventions for reducing mental distress in patients undergoing dental procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;69:22-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.005. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Castelnuovo G, Giusti EM, Manzoni GM, Saviola D, Gatti A, Gabrielli S, et al. Psychological Treatments and Psychotherapies in the Neurorehabilitation of Pain: Evidences and Recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation. Front Psychol. 2016;7:115. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00115. | Wrong publication type |
Catsaros S, Wendland J. Hypnosis-based interventions during pregnancy and childbirth and their impact on women's childbirth experience: A systematic review. Midwifery. 2020;84:102666. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102666. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Catsaros S, Wendland J. Psychological impact of hypnosis for pregnancy and childbirth: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2023;50:101713. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101713. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Chen PY, Liu YM, Chen ML. The Effect of Hypnosis on Anxiety in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017;14(3):223-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12215. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Coelho HF, Canter PH, Ernst E. The effectiveness of hypnosis for the treatment of anxiety: A systematic review. Prim Care Community Psychiatr. 2007;12(2):49-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17468840701680678. | Wrong publication type |
Coitinho Biurra Y, Chesterman S, Skvarc D, Mikocka-Walus A, Evans S. Hypnotherapy for chronic pelvic pain: A scoping systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2023;52:101771. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101771. | Wrong intervention |
Cramer H, Lauche R, Paul A, Langhorst J, Kummel S, Dobos GJ. Hypnosis in breast cancer care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Integr Cancer Ther. 2015;14(1):5-15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735414550035. | Wrong intervention |
Cyna AM, McAuliffe GL, Andrew MI. Hypnosis for pain relief in labour and childbirth: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(4):505-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh225. | Wrong publication type |
Danon N, Al‐Gobari M, Burnand B, Rodondi PY. Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psychooncology. 2021;31(3):345-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
de Jong AE, Middelkoop E, Faber AW, Van Loey NE. Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: a systematic literature review. Burns. 2007;33(7):811-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.01.005. | Wrong publication type |
De Stefano R, Bruno A, Muscatello MR, Cedro C, Cervino G, Fiorillo L. Fear and anxiety managing methods during dental treatments: a systematic review of recent data. Minerva Stomatol. 2019;68(6):317-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04288-2. | Wrong publication type |
Dumont E, Ogez D, Nahas S, El-Baalbaki G. The Use of Hypnosis during the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2023;71(1):25-47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2160258. | Wrong publication type |
Fardin A, Rezaei SA, Maslakpak MH. Non-pharmacological interventions for anxiety in burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2020;49:102341. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102341. | Wrong combination of population and outcome |
Flammer E, Bongartz W. On the efficacy of hypnosis: a meta‐analytic study. Contemporary Hypnosis. 2006;20(4):179-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.277. | Wrong publication type |
Flynn N. Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Hypnosis for the Management of Headache. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2018;66(4):343-52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2018.1494432. | Wrong publication type |
Franch M, Alarcon A, Capafons A. Applications of Hypnosis as an Adjuvant in Oncological Settings: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2023;71(1):1-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2160255. | No separate reporting of relevant combination of intervention and control |
Gamus D, Kedar A, Kleinhauz M. Hypnosis in palliative care. Prog Palliat Care. 2012;20(5):278-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1179/1743291X12Y.0000000025. | Wrong publication type |
Garland EL, Brintz CE, Hanley AW, Roseen EJ, Atchley RM, Gaylord SA, et al. Mind-Body Therapies for Opioid-Treated Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(1):91-105. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4917. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Gasteratos K, Papakonstantinou M, Man A, Babatsikos E, Tamalonis A, Goverman J. Adjunctive Nonpharmacologic Interventions for the Management of Burn Pain: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(5):985e-94e. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009059. | No separate reporting of relevant population and intervention |
Gholamrezaei A, Ardestani SK, Emami MH. Where does hypnotherapy stand in the management of irritable bowel syndrome? A systematic review. J Altern Complement Med. 2006;12(6):517-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.12.517. | Wrong publication type |
Goldenberg JZ, Brignall M, Hamilton M, Beardsley J, Batson RD, Hawrelak J, et al. Biofeedback for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(11). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012530.pub2. | Wrong intervention |
Hadoush H, Alawneh A, Kassab M, Al-Wardat M, Al-Jarrah M. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in pain management in patients with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;50(4):347-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-210328. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention and control |
Hershcovici T, Achem SR, Jha LK, Fass R. Systematic review: the treatment of noncardiac chest pain. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;35(1):5-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04904.x. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Hoffmann B, Erwood K, Ncomanzi S, Fischer V, O'Brien D, Lee A. Management strategies for adult patients with dental anxiety in the dental clinic: a systematic review. Aust Dent J. 2022;67(S1):S3-S13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12926. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Holler M, Koranyi S, Strauss B, Rosendahl J. Efficacy of Hypnosis in Adults Undergoing Surgical Procedures: A meta-analytic update. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;85:102001. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102001. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Huntley AL, Coon JT, Ernst E. Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):36-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.008. | Wrong publication type |
Jensen M, Patterson DR. Hypnotic treatment of chronic pain. J Behav Med. 2006;29(1):95-124. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9031-6. | Wrong publication type |
Kekecs Z, Nagy T, Varga K. The effectiveness of suggestive techniques in reducing postoperative side effects: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(6):1407-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000466. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Kirsch I, Montgomery G, Sapirstein G. Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63(2):214-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.63.2.214. | Wrong publication type |
Kisely SR, Campbell LA, Yelland MJ, Paydar A. Psychological interventions for symptomatic management of non-specific chest pain in patients with normal coronary anatomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(6):CD004101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004101.pub5. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Lami MJ, Martinez MP, Sanchez AI. Systematic review of psychological treatment in fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17(7):345. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-013-0345-8. | Wrong publication type |
Langlois P, Perrochon A, David R, Rainville P, Wood C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Hypnosis to manage musculoskeletal and neuropathic chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;135:104591. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104591. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Lanini I, Amass T, Calabrisotto CS, Fabbri S, Falsini S, Adembri C, et al. The influence of psychological interventions on surgical outcomes: a systematic review. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022;2(1):31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-022-00057-4. | No included studies on hypnosis |
Lee E, Faber J, Bowles K. A Review of Trauma Specific Treatments (TSTs) for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Clin Soc Work J. 2021;50(2):147-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00816-w. | Wrong publication type |
Lee HH, Choi YY, Choi MG. The Efficacy of Hypnotherapy in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;20(2):152-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2014.20.2.152. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Madden K, Middleton P, Cyna AM, Matthewson M, Jones L. Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. Cochrane Libr. 2016;2016(5):CD009356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Maloh J, Engel T, Natarelli N, Nong Y, Zufall A, Sivamani RK. Systematic Review of Psychological Interventions for Quality of Life, Mental Health, and Hair Growth in Alopecia Areata and Scarring Alopecia. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030964. | Wrong outcome |
Marc I, Toureche N, Ernst E, Hodnett ED, Blanchet C, Dodin S, Njoya MM. Mind-body interventions during pregnancy for preventing or treating women's anxiety. Cochrane Libr. 2011;2011(11):CD007559. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007559.pub2. | Wrong intervention of included study |
Maresca G, Nocito V, Lo Buono V, Latella D, Di Cara M, Formica C, et al. Hypnotherapy as a Nonpharmacological Treatment for the Psychological Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis. Altern Ther Health Med. 2023;29(4):266-9. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
McGuire H, Hawton K. Interventions for vaginismus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD001760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001760. | No relevant combination of intervention and outcome |
McKittrick ML, Connors EL, McKernan LC. Hypnosis for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Scoping Review. Pain Med. 2022;23(5):1015-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab320. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Merz AE, Campus G, Abrahamsen R, Wolf TG. Hypnosis on acute dental and maxillofacial pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2022;123:104184. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104184. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Michael T, Schanz CG, Mattheus HK, Issler T, Frommberger U, Kollner V, Equit M. Do adjuvant interventions improve treatment outcome in adult patients with posttraumatic stress disorder receiving trauma-focused psychotherapy? A systematic review. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019;10(1):1634938. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1634938. | Wrong publication type |
Milling LS, Valentine KE, LoStimolo LM, Nett AM, McCarley HS. Hypnosis and the Alleviation of Clinical Pain: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2021;69(3):297-322. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1920330. | Wrong publication type |
Milling LS, Valentine KE, McCarley HS, LoStimolo LM. A Meta-Analysis of Hypnotic Interventions for Depression Symptoms: High Hopes for Hypnosis? Am J Clin Hypn. 2019;61(3):227-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2018.1489777. | Wrong publication type |
Montgomery GH, David D, Winkel G, Silverstein JH, Bovbjerg DH. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(6):1639-45, table of contents. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200206000-00052. | Wrong publication type |
Montgomery GH, DuHamel KN, Redd WH. A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: how effective is hypnosis? Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000;48(2):138-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140008410045. | Wrong publication type |
Montgomery GH, Sucala M, Baum T, Schnur JB. Hypnosis for Symptom Control in Cancer Patients at the End-of-Life: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2017;65(3):296-307. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2017.1314728. | No included studies |
Morone NE, Greco CM. Mind-body interventions for chronic pain in older adults: a structured review. Pain Med. 2007;8(4):359-75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00312.x. | Wrong publication type |
Nelson MK. Meta-analysis: Hypnotherapy/cognitive-behavioral therapy and its efficacy on depression compared to pharmacotherapy: ProQuest Information & Learning; 2002. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2002-95016-315&site=ehost-live. | Wrong publication type |
Neron S, Stephenson R. Effectiveness of hypnotherapy with cancer patients' trajectory: emesis, acute pain, and analgesia and anxiolysis in procedures. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2007;55(3):336-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701338647. | Wrong publication type |
Noergaard MW, Hakonsen SJ, Bjerrum M, Pedersen PU. The effectiveness of hypnotic analgesia in the management of procedural pain in minimally invasive procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(23-24):4207-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15025. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
O'Toole SK, Solomon SL, Bergdahl SA. A Meta-Analysis of Hypnotherapeutic Techniques in the Treatment of PTSD Symptoms. J Trauma Stress. 2016;29(1):97-100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22077. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
O'Reilly P, Meskell P, Whelan B, Kennedy C, Ramsay B, Coffey A, et al. Psychotherapeutic interventions for burns patients and the potential use with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis patients: A systematic integrative review. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0270424. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270424. | Wrong publication type |
Okuyama T, Akechi T, Mackenzie L, Furukawa TA. Psychotherapy for depression among advanced, incurable cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;56:16-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.03.012. | Wrong intervention |
Paggiaro AO, Paggiaro PBS, Fernandes RAQ, Freitas NO, Carvalho VF, Gemperli R. Posttraumatic stress disorder in burn patient: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(5):1586-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.052. | Wrong combination of intervention and population |
Patel RM, Anderson BL, Bartholomew JB. Interventions to Manage Pain Catastrophizing Following Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res. 2022;15:1679-89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S353385. | Wrong intervention |
Perusinghe M, Chen KY, McDermott B. Evidence-Based Management of Depression in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review. J Palliat Med. 2021;24(5):767-81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0659. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Phianmongkhol Y, Thongubon K, Woottiluk P. Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Techniques for Control of Pain in Lung Cancer Patients: An Integrated Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(14):6033-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.14.6033. | Wrong publication type |
Popa SL, Chiarioni G, David L, Dumitrascu DL. The Efficacy of Hypnotherapy in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia. Am J Ther. 2019;26(6):e704-e13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001033. | Wrong publication type |
Provencal SC, Bond S, Rizkallah E, El-Baalbaki G. Hypnosis for burn wound care pain and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns. 2018;44(8):1870-81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.017. | Wrong publication type |
Qian J, Sun S, Wang M, Yu X. Nonpharmacological pain management interventions in medical and surgical abortion: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2023;29(2):e13056. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13056. | Wrong publication type |
Rajasekaran M, Edmonds PM, Higginson IL. Systematic review of hypnotherapy for treating symptoms in terminally ill adult cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2005;19(5):418-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216305pm1030oa. | Wrong publication type |
Ramondo N, Gignac GE, Pestell CF, Byrne SM. Clinical Hypnosis as an Adjunct to Cognitive Behavior Therapy: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2021;69(2):169-202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1877549. | Wrong publication type |
Ribeiro NFP, Ribeiro CJN, Pinto JS, Ribeiro MCO. Is there evidence of efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions in the acute pain management during the laser retinal photocoagulation of patients with diabetic retinopathy? Eur J Pain. 2020;24(3):665-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1509. | Wrong publication type |
Rotaru T-S, Rusu A. A Meta-Analysis for the Efficacy of Hypnotherapy in Rotaru TS, Rusu A. A Meta-Analysis for the Efficacy of Hypnotherapy in Alleviating PTSD Symptoms. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2016;64(1):116-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2015.1099406. | Wrong publication type |
Samami E, Shahhosseini Z, Elyasi F. The Effect of Psychological Interventions on the Quality of Life in Women with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021;28(3):503-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09794-0. | Wrong publication type |
Sandvik RK, Olsen BF, Rygh LJ, Moi AL. Pain relief from nonpharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(9-10):1488-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15194. | Wrong publication type |
Schaefert R, Klose P, Moser G, Hauser W. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of hypnosis in adult irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2014;76(5):389-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000039. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Shah K, Ramos-Garcia M, Bhavsar J, Lehrer P. Mind-body treatments of irritable bowel syndrome symptoms: An updated meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2020;128:103462. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103462. | No separate reporting of relevant outcome and population |
Sheinfeld Gorin S, Krebs P, Badr H, Janke EA, Jim HS, Spring B, et al. Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(5):539-47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.0437. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Shen YH, Nahas R. Complementary and alternative medicine for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55(2):143-8. | Wrong publication type |
Sine H, Achbani A, Filali K. The Effect of Hypnosis on the Intensity of Pain and Anxiety in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Controlled Experimental Trials. Cancer Invest. 2022;40(3):235-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2021.1998520. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM, Crowther CA. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006(4):CD003521. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003521.pub2. | No relevant combination of intervention and outcome |
Surdea-Blaga T, Baban A, Nedelcu L, Dumitrascu DL. Psychological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016;25(3):359-66. | Wrong publication type |
Syrjala KL, Jensen MP, Mendoza ME, Yi JC, Fisher HM, Keefe FJ. Psychological and behavioral approaches to cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(16):1703-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4825. | Wrong publication type |
Tan G, Hammond DC, Joseph G. Hypnosis and irritable bowel syndrome: a review of efficacy and mechanism of action. Am J Clin Hypn. 2005;47(3):161-78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2005.10401481. | Wrong publication type |
Tefikow S, Barth J, Maichrowitz S, Beelmann A, Strauss B, Rosendahl J. Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(5):623-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.005. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Thompson T, Terhune DB, Oram C, Sharangparni J, Rouf R, Solmi M, et al. The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;99:298-310. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.013. | Wrong publication type |
Valentine KE, Milling LS, Clark LJ, Moriarty CL. The Efficacy of Hypnosis as a Treatment for Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2019;67(3):336-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2019.1613863. | Wrong publication type |
Van Etten ML, Taylor S. Comparative efficacy of treatments for post‐traumatic stress disorder: a meta‐analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother. 1998;5(3):126-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0879(199809)5:3<126::Aid-cpp153>3.0.Co;2-h. | Wrong publication type |
Villa G, Lanini I, Amass T, Bocciero V, Scire Calabrisotto C, Chelazzi C, et al. Effects of psychological interventions on anxiety and pain in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Perioper Med (Lond). 2020;9(1):38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00169-x. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Wahbeh H, Senders A, Neuendorf R, Cayton J. Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Systematic Review. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2014;19(3):161-75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587214525403. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Webb AN, Kukuruzovic RH, Catto-Smith AG, Sawyer SM. Hypnotherapy for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(4):CD005110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005110.pub2. | Wrong intervention |
Weisfeld CC, Turner JA, Dunleavy K, Ko A, Bowen JI, Roelk B, et al. Dealing with Anxious Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Nonpharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Medical or Dental Procedures. J Altern Complement Med. 2021;27(9):717-26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0504. | Wrong publication type |
Whale K, Wylde V, Beswick A, Rathbone J, Vedhara K, Gooberman-Hill R. Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e029742. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029742. | Wrong intervention |
Windgassen S, Moss-Morris R, Chilcot J, Sibelli A, Goldsmith K, Chalder T. The journey between brain and gut: A systematic review of psychological mechanisms of treatment effect in irritable bowel syndrome. Br J Health Psychol. 2017;22(4):701-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12250. | Wrong intervention |
Wolf TG, Schlappi S, Benz CI, Campus G. Efficacy of Hypnosis on Dental Anxiety and Phobia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci. 2022;12(5). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050521. | Wrong publication type |
Żelezik M, Sadowski M. Hypnosis as a part of holistic medical treatment: A systematic review. Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia. 2020;15(1):21-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5114/nan.2020.97399. | Wrong publication type |
Zeng J, Wang L, Cai Q, Wu J, Zhou C. Effect of hypnosis before general anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minor surgery for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland surgery. 2022;11(3):588-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-114. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Zeng YS, Wang C, Ward KE, Hume AL. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Hospice and Palliative Care: A Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(5):781-94 e4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.016. | Wrong publication type |
Zhang Y, Montoya L, Ebrahim S, Busse JW, Couban R, McCabe RE, et al. Hypnosis/Relaxation therapy for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015;29(2):115-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.1330. | No separate reporting of relevant intervention |
Bilaga 4 Risk för bias hos relevanta systematiska översikter
The risk of bias of included systematic reviews is appraised using an assessment tool based on AMSTAR revised by SBU*. The assessment tool is comprised of six steps based on the items in AMSTAR. Systematic reviews that did not meet the requirements in steps one to three were not assessed further. A systematic review is of moderate risk of bias if it fulfills all the requirements up to step four. For low risk of bias, steps five and six must also be fulfilled.