Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services
This publication was published more than 5 years ago. The state of knowledge may have changed.
Optimizing heart failure treatment using serial measurements of natriuretic peptides
Heart failure is when the heart does not pump blood sufficiently. Dominating symptoms are shortness of breath, fatigue and peripheral oedema. The disease is serious and may result in considerable impairment of quality of life and has a high mortality. The prognosis is often poor but may be improved if the disease is early diagnosed and the medical management and pharmacotherapy is optimized. Natriuretic peptides are used as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis for heart failure. The peptide levels also mirror changes in the level of heart failure. To optimize the clinical outcome serial measurements of natriuretic peptides has been used as a therapeutic tool.
Share on Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
Share via Email
Question
Is there evidence that adding serial measurements of natriuretic peptides in heart failure patients in primary care, improve outcomes like hospital readmissions and quality of life in these patients as compared with treatment according to guidelines?
Table with identified studies
| * = 12 RCT:s occurred in both of the systematic reviews HF = Heart failure; LVEF = Left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association; NP = Natriuretic peptide; BNP = B-type natriuretic peptide |
||
| Included studies | Population/Intervention | Outcome |
| Kahn et al 2018 [1] | ||
| 18 RCT:s* (11 multi center and 7 single center studies, in total 5 116 patients) One study was performed in primary care |
Monitoring of natriuretic peptides in treatment of heart failure patients | Total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalisations, all-cause hospitalisations, change in LVEF, change in NYHA class, symptomatic hypotension, and renal dysfunction |
| Authors' conclusion: “This meta-analysis showed no significant reduction in mortality or HF-related hospitalizations with NP-guided therapy. The quality of evidence is affected by risk of bias in individual studies. NP-guided therapy should be further tested in a clinical trial which accounts for the current limitations.” |
||
| Pufulete et al 2018 [2] | ||
| 14 RCT:s* (10 multicenter and 4 single center studies) in total 3 968 patients One study was performed in primary care. |
Monitoring of natriuretic peptides in treatment of heart failure patients | Primary outcome: all cause mortality Secondary outcomes: HF related death, cardiovascular death, all-cause hospitalisation, HF hospitalisation, adverse advents and quality of life |
| Authors' conclusion: “BNP-guided therapy did not reduce mortality but reduced HF hospitalisation. The overall quality of the evidence varied from low to very low. The relevance of these findings to unselected patients, particularly those managed by community generalists, are unclear.” |
||
References
- Khan MS, Siddiqi TJ, Usman MS, Sreenivasan J, Fugar S, Riaz H, et al. Does natriuretic peptide monitoring improve outcomes in heart failure patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2018;263:80-87.
- Pufulete M, Maishman R, Dabner L, Higgins JPT, Rogers CA, Dayer M, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide-guided therapy for heart failure (HF): a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) and aggregate data. Syst Rev 2018;7:112.
Literature search
Project group
Claes Lennmarken, Sally Saad, Sara Fundell and Miriam Entesarian Matsson at SBU.
