Transperineal ultrasound in addition to clinical assessment in the diagnosis of birth injuries after vaginal delivery
What evidence is needed?
More primary research is needed.
What evidence is available?
Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:
SBU. Förlossningsbristningar – diagnostik samt erfarenheter av bemötande och information: en systematisk översikt och utvärdering av medicinska, hälsoekonomiska och etiska aspekter. Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering (SBU); 2021. SBU Utvärderar, rapport nr 323. More about the review
Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:
None identified
- Registration number:
- Published:
![](/static/images/pusselbit.jpg)
Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.