Dynamic braces for non surgical treatment of patients with isolated PCL injuries

Reading time less than 1 minute
This page contains 1 evidence gap
  1. Dynamic braces for non surgical treatment of patients with isolated PCL injuries
Population:
Patients between 16-60 years with acute, isolated PCL injuries of grade I and II and who is given non surgical treatment
Intervention:
Dynamic braces
Comparison:
No dynamic brace
Outcomes:
Function, stability, pain, quality of life, patient satisfaction, complications

What evidence is needed?

More primary research is needed.

What evidence is available?

Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

Effekt av behandling med dynamisk ortos vid isolerad bakre korsbandsskada grad I-II: Örebro: Centre for Assessment of Medical Technology in Örebro (Camtö); 2023. HTA-rapport 2023:58
More about the review

Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Registration number:
Published:
Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.
To top

Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.