Physiotherapy via digital contact in comparison with in-house mediated physiotherapy for patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip

Reading time less than 1 minute
This page contains 1 evidence gap
  1. Physiotherapy via digital contact in comparison with in-house mediated physiotherapy for patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip
Population:
Patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip
Intervention:
Physiotherapy via digital contact (app, website, phone coaching)
Comparison:
In-house mediated physiotherapy (group or individually)
Outcomes:
Function, pain, quality of life

What evidence is needed?

More primary research is needed.

What evidence is available?

Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

Lohse G, Li M. En jämförelse mellan digital och klinikbaserad fysioterapi vid artros i knä eller höft [A comparison between digital vs. in-clinic physiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip]. Örebro: HTA-enheten Camtö; 2022. HTA-rapport 2022:52. More about the review

Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Registration number:
Published:
Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.
To top

Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.