Mobile applications for monitoring and feedback in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

What evidence is needed?

More primary research is needed.

What evidence is available?

Reliable systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

Nousios P, Snellman A, Ahlzén R. En systematisk översikt kring hälsoappar för monitorering och feedback vid astma och kroniskt obstruktiv lungsjukdom (KOL) [A systematic review of mobile applications for monitoring and feedback in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)]. Örebro: HTA-enheten Camtö; 2022. HTA-rapport 2022:54. More about the review

Reliable, but not updated, systematic reviews that show evidence gaps:

None identified

Registration number:
Published:
Research conducted after publication could potentially change the nature of the evidence.

Evidence gap identifies methods or practices for which no conclusive systematic review of benefits and harms has been published. Gaps in scientific evidence appear on the SBU website to help researchers and granting agencies identify areas that are in need of research or systematic review. An additional objective is to offer healthcare and social service providers a basis for setting priorities.