This publication was published more than 5 years ago. The state of knowledge may have changed.

Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program – NIDCAP

Reading time approx. 12 minutes Published: Publication type:

SBU Assessment

Presents a comprehensive, systematic assessment of available scientific evidence for effects on health, social welfare or disability. Full assessments include economic, social and ethical impact analyses. Assessment teams include professional practitioners and academics. Before publication the report is reviewed by external experts, and scientific conclusions approved by the SBU Board of Directors.

Contact SBU
Published: Report no: 2006-03 https://www.sbu.se/200603e

Summary and Conclusions

Technology and target group

Important advancements have been made in recent years regarding the care of sick and preterm infants. Health services in Sweden, and internationally, have introduced various methods aimed at promoting bonding, breastfeeding, and neurological development. A common feature of these methods is their focus on the newborn as an individual who has the capacity to interact with his or her environment. An intervention model, the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP), has been developed to stimulate preterm infants at levels adapted to the childs degree of neurological maturity. In Sweden, approximately 2800 children are born each year with birth weights under 2500 grams. Around 500 of these infants have birth weights below 1500 grams. The target group for NIDCAP is preterm infants, but exact parameters regarding gestational age or birth weight are not specified.

Primary question

What effects does NIDCAP have in preterm infants on the psychomotor development, neurological status, and medical/ nursing care outcomes during their inpatient stay, and what are the potential cost-related effects of the method? This assessment is based on a systematic literature review.

Patient benefit

The evidence compiled on the effects of NIDCAP is based on 11 articles that stem from 6 randomized controlled trials including approximately 250 children. Each of the studies was appraised as having medium quality and internal validity. Most of the studies were small, and several investigated many different outcome variables, eg, respiratory distress, feeding/growth, and complications, which somewhat diminishes the value of these studies. All of the studies compared psychomotor development and neurological status between the intervention and control groups. The longest followup period reported in the studies was just over 5 years. In outcome variables where a significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups, all of the studies showed better results for the NIDCAP group. The improvements were demonstrated mainly in cognitive and psychomotor development. The findings also showed a reduced need for respiratory support.

Economic aspects

NIDCAP involves costs for the specialized training of personnel and costs for the continuous behavioral observation associated with the method. No studies have been identified that weigh the total cost of the method against its effects.

SBU's appraisal of the evidence

The scientific evidence showing that NIDCAP has positive effects on cognitive and motor development in preterm infants is limited (Evidence Grade 3)*. Scientific grounds for assessing the effects of NIDCAP would be substantially enhanced by a sufficiently comprehensive study with extended followup and a clear focus on one or two important outcome variables.

* Criteria for Evidence Grading SBUs Conclusions:
Evidence Grade 1 - Strong Scientific Evidence. The conclusion is corroborated by at least two independent studies with high quality and internal validity, or a good systematic overview.
Evidence Grade 2 - Moderately Strong Scientific Evidence. The conclusion is corroborated by one study with high quality and internal validity, and at least two studies with medium quality and internal validity.
Evidence Grade 3 - Limited Scientific Evidence. The conclusion is corroborated by at least two studies with medium quality and internal validity.
Insufficient Scientific Evidence. No conclusions can be drawn when there are not any studies that meet the criteria for quality and internal validity.
Contradictory Scientific Evidence. No conclusions can be drawn when there are studies with the same quality and internal validity whose findings contradict each other.

This summary is based on a report prepared at SBU in collaboration with Lars Wallin, RN, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm and Mats Eriksson, RN, PhD, Örebro County Council. It has been reviewed by Prof. Uwe Ewald, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala and Viveca Lindh, RN, PhD, Umeå University, Umeå.

The complete report is available only in Swedish.

SBU Alert is a service provided by SBU in collaboration with the Medical Products Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions.

References

  1. Wallin L (red). Omvårdnad av det nyfödda barnet. Studentlitteratur, Lund; 2001.
  2. Wallin L (red). Neonatal omvårdnad. Riktlinjer för kvalitetsutveckling. Svensk sjuksköterskeförening och Spris förlag, Stockholm; 1997.
  3. Fakta om mammor, förlossningar och nyfödda barn - Medicinska födelseregistret 1973 till 2000. Uppdaterat tabellunderlag 2005-10-25. Socialstyrelsen, Epidemiologiskt centrum, Stockholm; 2002. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/NR/rdonlyres/FE43E1FE-329E-4DCE-93B1-91144500EDF3/5520/trender19732003.xls
  4. Perinatalt omhändertagande vid extrem underburenhet. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm; 2004. Artikelnr: 2004-123-15.
  5. Franck LS, Cox S, Allen A, Winter I. Measuring neonatal intensive care unit-related parental stress. J Adv Nurs 2005;49(6):608-15.
  6. Dudek-Shriber L. Parent stress in the neonatal intensive care unit and the influence of parent and infant characteristics. Am J Occup Ther 2004;58(5):509-20.
  7. Als H. NIDCAP Program Guide. Childrens Hospital, Boston; 2005.
  8. Als H. Toward a synactive theory of development: Promise for the assessment and support of infant individuality. Infant Mental Health Journal 1982;3(4):229-43.
  9. Als H. Manual for the naturalistic observation of newborn behavior (preterm and fullterm infants). The Childrens Hospital, Boston; 1984.
  10. Als H, Butler S, Kosta S, McAnulty G. The Assessment of Preterm Infants Behavior (APIB): furthering the understanding and measurement of neurodevelopmental competence in preterm and full-term infants. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005;11(1):94-102.
  11. Kleberg A, Hedberg Nyqvist K. Utvecklingsanpassad neonatalvård - En handbok som bygger på NIDCAP-modellen. 3 uppl, Klemed HB, Falun; 1993.
  12. Kleberg A. Familjecentrerad utvecklingsstödjande vård enligt NIDCAP. I: Wallin L (red). Omvårdnad av det nyfödda barnet. Studentlitteratur, Lund; 2001.
  13. Als H, Lawhon G, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Gibes-Grossman R, Blickman JG. Individualized developmental care for the very low-birth-weight preterm infant. Medical and neurofunctional effects. JAMA 1994;272(11):853-8.
  14. Fleisher BE, VandenBerg K, Constantinou J, Heller C, Benitz WE, Johnson A et al. Individualized developmental care for very-low-birth-weight premature infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1995;34(10):523-9.
  15. Ariagno RL, Thoman EB, Boeddiker MA, Kugener B, Constantinou JC, Mirmiran M et al. Developmental care does not alter sleep and development of premature infants. Pediatrics 1997;100(6):E9.
  16. Heller C, Constantinou JC, VandenBerg K, Benitz W, Fleisher BE. Sedation administered to very low birth weight premature infants. J Perinatol 1997;17(2):107-12.
  17. Westrup B, Kleberg A, von Eichwald K, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program in a Swedish setting. Pediatrics 2000;105(1 Pt 1):66-72.
  18. Westrup B, Hellstrom-Westas L, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. No indications of increased quiet sleep in infants receiving care based on the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP). Acta Paediatr 2002;91(3):318-22.
  19. Kleberg A, Westrup B, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. Indications of improved cognitive development at one year of age among infants born very prematurely who received care based on the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Early Hum Dev 2002;68(2):83-91.
  20. Westrup B, Bohm B, Lagercrantz H, Stjernqvist K. Preschool outcome in children born very prematurely and cared for according to the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Acta Paediatr 2004;93(4):498-507.
  21. Als H, Gilkerson L, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Buehler DM, Vandenberg K et al. A three-center, randomized, controlled trial of individualized developmental care for very low birth weight preterm infants: medical, neurodevelopmental, parenting, and caregiving effects. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003;24(6):399-408.
  22. Buehler DM, Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Liederman J. Effectiveness of individualized developmental care for low-risk preterm infants: behavioral and electrophysiologic evidence. Pediatrics 1995;96(5 Pt 1):923-32.
  23. Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Rivkin MJ, Vajapeyam S, Mulkern RV et al. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics 2004;113(4):846-57.
  24. Kangaroo mother care: a practical guide: World Health Organization (Department of Reproductive Health and Research), Geneva; 2003.
  25. Harrison H. The principles for family-centered neonatal care. Pediatrics 1993;92(5):643-50.
  26. Sizun J, Ratynski N, Boussard C. Humane neonatal care initiative, NIDCAP and family-centred neonatal intensive care. Neonatal Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program. Acta Paediatr 1999;88(10):1172.
  27. Levin A. Humane Neonatal Care Initiative. Acta Paediatr 1999;88(4):353-5.
  28. Koldewijn K, Wolf MJ, van Wassenaer A, Beelen A, de Groot IJ, Hedlund R. The Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program to support preterm infants after hospital discharge: a pilot study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47(2):105-12.
  29. Wolf MJ, Koldewijn K, Meijssen D, van Wassenaer A, Beelen A, Hedlund R et al. Outline for a randomised controlled trial on a neurobehavioral intervention program for VLBW infants and their parents after discharge from hospital. IDNIC 2005, London; 2005. p 55-6.
  30. Symington A, Pinelli J. Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants.
    The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD001814. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001814.pub2.
  31. Jacobs SE, Sokol J, Ohlsson A. The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program is not supported by meta-analyses of the data. J Pediatr 2002;140(6):699-706. Review.
  32. Als H, Lawhon G, Brown E, Gibes R, Duffy FH, McAnulty G et al. Individualized behavioral and environmental care for the very low birth weight preterm infant at high risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: neonatal intensive care unit and developmental outcome. Pediatrics 1986;78(6):1123-32.
  33. Becker PT, Grunwald PC, Moorman J, Stuhr S. Outcomes of developmentally supportive nursing care for very low birth weight infants. Nurs Res 1991;40(3):150-5.
  34. Stevens B, Petryshen P, Hawkins J, Smith B, Taylor P. Developmental versus conventional care: a comparison of clinical outcomes for very low birth weight infants. Can J Nurs Res 1996;28(4):97-113.
  35. Huppi PS, Schuknecht B, Boesch C, Bossi E, Felblinger J, Fusch C et al. Structural and neurobehavioral delay in postnatal brain development of preterm infants. Pediatr Res 1996;39(5):895-901.
  36. Maas YG, Mirmiran M, Hart AA, Koppe JG, Ariagno RL, Spekreijse H. Predictive value of neonatal neurological tests for developmental outcome of preterm infants. J Pediatr 2000;137(1):100-6.
  37. Scandinavian NIDCAP® Center. Avgifter. 2005. http://www.nidcap.nu/AV.htm
  38. Scandinavian NIDCAP® Center. Underlag till handlingsplan för införandet av familjecentrerad utvecklingsanpassad neonatalvård. 2005. http://www.nidcap.nu/files/infora_NIDCAP.htm
  39. Kleberg A. Personlig kommunikation. 2005-09-09.
  40. Ensenat S, Peters K, Tyebkhan J, Hendson L, Coté J, McPherson C. NIDCAP-based care reduces late onset sepsis in very low birth weight VLBW infants. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting. May 14-17, 2005. Washington DC.
  41. Hendson L, Tyebkhan J, Peters K, Coté J, McPherson C. Randomized Controlled Trial of NIDCAP-Based Care in VLBW Infants: 18-Month Neurodevelopmental Outcomes. Pediatric Academic SocietiesAnnual Meeting. May 14-17, 2005. Washington DC.
  42. Maguire C. The Leiden developmental care study: The effect of developmental care on preterm infants < 32 weeks gestational age. IDNIC 2005, London; 2005. p 26.
  43. Holsti L, Grunau RE, Oberlander TF, Whitfield MF. Specific Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program movements are associated with acute pain in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2004;114(1):65-72.
  44. Holsti L, Grunau RE, Oberlander TF, Whitfield MF. Prior pain induces heightened motor responses during clustered care in preterm infants in the NICU. Early Hum Dev 2005;81(3):293-302.
  45. Pressler JL, Hepworth JT. A quantitative use of the NIDCAP tool. The effect of gender and race on very preterm neonates behavior. Clin Nurs Res 2002;11(1):89-102.
  46. Pressler JL, Hepworth JT, Helm JM, Wells NL. Behaviors of very preterm neonates as documented using NIDCAP observations. Neonatal Netw 2001;20(8):15-24.
  47. Abromeit DH. The newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) as a model for clinical music therapy interventions with premature infants. Music Therapy Perspectives 2003;21(2):60-8.
  48. Catelin C, Tordjman S, Morin V, Oger E, Sizun J. Clinical, physiologic, and biologic impact of environmental and behavioral interventions in neonates during a routine nursing procedure. J Pain 2005;6(12):791-7.
  49. Bertelle V, Mabin D, Adrien J, Sizun J. Sleep of preterm neonates under developmental care or regular environmental conditions. Early Hum Dev 2005;81(7):595-600.
  50. Wielenga JM, Smit BJ, Unk LK. How satisfied are parents supported by nurses with the NIDCAP model of care for their preterm infant? J Nurs Care Qual 2006;21(1):41-8.
  51. Sizun J, Westrup B. Early developmental care for preterm neonates: a call for more research. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89(5):F384-8. Review.
  52. Cuttini M. A European developmental care survey. IDNIC 2005, London; 2005. p 18.
  53. Westrup B, Kleberg A, Wallin L, Lagercrantz H, Wikblad K, Stjernqvist K. Evaluation of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) in a Swedish setting. Prenat Neonat Med 1997;(2):366-75.
  54. Parker SJ, Zahr LK, Cole JG, Brecht ML. Outcome after developmental intervention in the neonatal intensive care unit for mothers of preterm infants with low socioeconomic status. J Pediatr 1992;120(5):780-5.
  55. Becker PT, Grunwald PC, Moorman J, Stuhr S. Effects of developmental care on behavioral organization in very-low-birth-weight infants. Nurs Res 1993;42(4):214-20.
  56. Mouradian LE, Als H. The influence of neonatal intensive care unit caregiving practices on motor functioning of preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther 1994;48(6):527-33.
  57. Petryshen P, Stevens B, Hawkins J, Stewart M. Comparing nursing costs for preterm infants receiving conventional vs. developmental care. Nurs Econ 1997;15(3):138-45, 150.
  58. Brown LD, Heermann JA. The effect of developmental care on preterm infant outcome. Appl Nurs Res 1997;10(4):190-7.
  59. Kleberg A, Westrup B, Stjernqvist K. Developmental outcome, child behaviour and mother-child interaction at 3 years of age following Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Intervention Program (NIDCAP) intervention. Early Hum Dev 2000;60(2):123-35.
  60. Prentice M, Stainton C. Outcomes of developmental care in an Australian neonatal intensive care nursery. Neonatal Netw 2003;22(6):17-23.
Page published
To top