SBU’s Conclusions
Few medical interventions have had as great an impact on global health as immunisation of children. Extensive immunisation programmes have eradicated smallpox completely and eliminated polio in all but a handful of countries. Thus, the benefits of immunisation are indisputable. But it is important to critically examine an intervention that is recommended for all infants. Routine immunisation must provide reasonable protection against potentially serious diseases, while the risk of serious adverse events must be low. Experience shows that immunisation coverage tends to decline if there is widespread concern about adverse events. Therefore, a solid body of knowledge is needed. Thus, SBU has been requested to review the published scientific literature regarding some vaccines included in the immunisation programme for children in Sweden.
The present scientific review and the experience from many years of the routine immunisation programme have shown that:
Immunisation with Haemophilus Influenzae type b Vaccine
Immunisation with Pertussis Vaccine
Immunisation with Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
Immunisation with Hepatitis B Vaccine
Immunisation Against Tuberculosis
Adverse Events Following Combination Vaccines
No evidence is available suggesting a greater frequency of hypotonic hyporesponsive episode or persistent inconsolable crying after administration of combination hexavalent, pentavalent or tetravalent vaccine than trivalent vaccine (DTPa) (Evidence Grade 3). The overall literature provides no substantial indication of a causal relationship between immunisation and the very occasional serious adverse events, including death, described in case reports or national adverse event reports (insufficient scientific evidence).
Print page »
Add bookmark »